Want to learn more about how Scientology is witchcraft?

Alleged Demonic, Witchcraft, and Satanic Influences in Scientology: A Comprehensive Analysis

1. Academic and Historical Analysis

Occult Origins and Esoteric Influences: Scholars of new religious movements note that Scientology shares certain elements with Western esoteric and occult traditions, though they debate the extent of this influence . L. Ron Hubbard’s early development of Scientology occurred in a milieu rich with occult and mystical ideas. Notably, Hubbard was involved in 1945–46 with John “Jack” Parsons, an American rocket scientist and devout follower of Aleister Crowley’s Thelema. Hubbard moved into Parsons’ Pasadena home and participated in Thelemic rituals – the two even collaborated on the “Babalon Working,” a sex-magick ritual intended to summon a goddess figure (Babalon, in Crowley’s cosmology) . This extraordinary episode was later confirmed in a 1969 Sunday Times exposé detailing Hubbard’s association with Crowley’s Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.) lodge in California . Such historical links to ritual magic and Crowley’s circle form part of Scientology’s origin story.

Esoteric Symbolism: Observers have also pointed out similarities in symbolism. For example, the eight-pointed cross used as the Scientology emblem may have been inspired by Crowley’s Rose Cross (a Rosicrucian/Golden Dawn symbol) – an indication that Hubbard borrowed from Western esoteric iconography . Hubbard’s private papers show he had immersed himself in occult literature from a young age. According to his son, Hubbard “first discovered Magick” at age 16 by reading Crowley’s Book of the Law , and records indicate Hubbard even joined the Rosicrucian order AMORC in 1940 to study mystical secrets . These historical details suggest that esoteric and mystical traditions (Rosicrucianism, Thelema, Eastern religions, etc.) were part of the eclectic mix from which Scientology emerged.

Scholarly Perspectives: Academically, there is a split opinion on how central these occult influences were. Some researchers (often former Scientologists turned critics, like Jon Atack) argue that Crowley’s magical ideas lie “at the very heart” of Scientology’s doctrines, essentially branding Scientology as a repackaged occult system . On the other hand, sociologists of religion such as Roy Wallis and J. Gordon Melton have downplayed this connection, viewing Scientology more as a psychological self-help religion or a unique new religion with diverse sources . Hugh B. Urban, a religion scholar, takes a nuanced view: after examining Hubbard’s writings, correspondence, and early lectures, Urban concludes that Crowley’s occult concepts do figure into early Scientology – but as “one – but only one – element in the rich, eclectic bricolage” of influences that Hubbard drew upon . In other words, Scientology’s formation was influenced in part by occultism, alongside Eastern philosophies, science fiction, and pop psychology . The academic consensus is that while Hubbard’s brush with the occult is historically factual, Scientology cannot be reduced to merely an occult or Satanic sect – it is a syncretic new religion that incorporated occult ideas into a broader framework.

2. Theological Critiques

Christian Perspectives – Heresy and Demonology: From the viewpoint of traditional theologies (especially conservative Christian critics), Scientology has been roundly condemned as spiritually dangerous, with some going so far as to label it demonic or Satanic. Christian apologists point out that Scientology’s doctrines directly contradict core Christian beliefs – for instance, Scientology explicitly denies a personal God and embraces reincarnation and self-deification, which are incompatible with Christianity . Hubbard even mocked the Christian idea of the soul: in one lecture, he argued that a person who tries to “save his soul” is chasing an illusion, joking that what people think is a soul might actually be a “demon circuit” in the mind . (In Hubbard’s terminology, a “demon circuit” refers to a kind of subconscious identity or false mental construct – but the choice of words, critics note, is telling .) Christian commentators cite such statements as evidence that Hubbard viewed the human soul in terms that evoke demonic entities, reinforcing their view that Scientology is theologically deviant .

Accusations of Satanic Influence: Beyond doctrinal incompatibility, some Christian critics assert that Scientology has Satanic overtones or occult darkness at its core. These allegations often stem from Hubbard’s own admissions and the church’s secret teachings. A notorious example is an alleged briefing Hubbard wrote for high-level Scientologists (OT VIII), in which he purportedly describes his mission as fulfilling the Biblical prophecy of the Antichrist. In this text – which references the “forces of Lucifer” as bringing enlightenment – Hubbard supposedly states: “the brief Antichrist period… represents the forces of Lucifer (literally, the ‘light-bearer’)… My mission could be said to fulfill the Biblical promise of this brief Antichrist period.” . This extraordinary statement (if genuine) led many Christian observers to conclude that Hubbard saw himself in alignment with Luciferian symbolism, essentially casting Scientology as a Luciferian enterprise. The Church of Scientology disputes the authenticity of that OT VIII document, but its very circulation has fueled anti-Scientology sentiment among evangelicals who already viewed the church as an “Anti-Christian” cult.

Occult Links and Satanism: Christian theologians also highlight Hubbard’s well-documented fascination with Aleister Crowley. Crowley was an occultist infamous for calling himself “The Beast 666” and promoting the maxim “Do what thou wilt” – he was widely regarded as a sinister Satanist figure in the early 20th century . Hubbard’s open praise of Crowley raises red flags for clergy. In a 1952 lecture series, Hubbard spoke admiringly of “the magic cults” of past centuries and recommended Crowley’s writings as “fascinating,” even referring to “my very good friend… Aleister Crowley” – noting Crowley “signs himself ‘The Beast 666’” . To Christian critics, Hubbard’s friendly reference to a man regarded as a Satanist is viewed as an admission of Satanic influence. Some go further and claim Hubbard was a practicing Satanist: Hubbard’s estranged son, Ronald DeWolf, alleged in an interview that his father “thought of himself as the Beast 666 incarnate,” especially after Crowley’s death in 1947 – implying Hubbard wanted to inherit Crowley’s Satanic mantle . (The Church rejects DeWolf’s testimony, attributing it to spite, but the story is frequently cited in theological critiques .)

Verdicts from Religious Scholars: Mainline religious scholars, while not as quick to use the term “demonic,” also recognize that Scientology fits the pattern of a “gnostic” or esoteric heresy in Christian terms . Its cosmology (spirits trapped in matter, secret knowledge for salvation) has been compared to ancient Gnosticism – which the early church deemed heretical and associated with “demonic” deception . Christian theologian Pheme Perkins notes that Gnostic myths involved a false creator god trapping souls in material bodies and a hidden true God offering liberation . Critics argue that Scientology’s narrative (e.g. an alien overlord Xenu trapping thetans in physical bodies, and Hubbard revealing secret knowledge to free them) parallels those “demonic” Gnostic myths . The upshot is that from a traditional theological perspective, Scientology is often seen as a form of occult spiritual deception – a modern synthesis of old heresies, potentially influenced by demonic forces, rather than a benign new religious movement. Catholic and Protestant counter-cult ministries commonly warn that involvement in Scientology opens one up to occult deception and ungodly influences, given its use of past-life trance auditing, spirit entities, and rejection of Christ. In sum, the theological critique holds that Scientology contains elements of demonology and Satanism (in symbol and practice), and is fundamentally incompatible with Christian faith .

3. Former Member Testimonies

Insider Accounts of Occult Practices: Testimonies from ex-Scientologists – especially those who reached advanced levels – often reinforce the notion that Scientology involves occult or supernatural phenomena (even if the Church frames them in scientific language). One striking claim comes from L. Ron Hubbard’s eldest son, Ronald DeWolf (a.k.a. L. Ron Hubbard Jr.), who left the Church and spoke out against his father in the 1980s. DeWolf alleged that Hubbard was deeply involved in black magic rites and believed himself guided or possessed by dark forces. He recounted that Hubbard was enamored with Crowley’s Satanic persona and at one point “decided he [Hubbard] should wear the cloak of the Beast 666” after Crowley’s passing . DeWolf even characterized Scientology’s upper echelons as demonic: “Scientology is black magic that is spread out over a long time frame… Black magic is the inner core of Scientology, and it is probably the only part of Scientology that really works.” Such statements from Hubbard’s own family have been widely publicized, bolstering the image of Scientology as occult in nature (though defenders question DeWolf’s credibility).

“Exorcism” of Body Thetans: Many former high-ranking Scientologists describe the religion’s secret practices in terms of spirit possession and exorcism. Starting at Operating Thetan level III (OT III) and continuing in further levels, members are taught about “Body Thetans” – countless invisible alien spirits that adhere to humans and cause spiritual harm (according to Hubbard’s hidden cosmology). Ex-members note that dealing with these entities is essentially the core of the advanced Scientology levels. As one critic quipped, “the ‘Body Thetans’ of OT levels III–VII are in fact the demons of Christian belief. The ‘OT levels’ are arguably the most expensive exorcism ritual ever sold to man.” . Indeed, those who have completed these levels (or read the formerly secret materials) report that Scientologists undergo exercises remarkably similar to exorcism – they locate spiritual parasites through auditing (sometimes even addressing the entities aloud and commanding them to depart, akin to casting out demons) . Former members like Dennis Erlich (a one-time Scientology “Quality Control” officer) have commented that Hubbard’s techniques taught people to treat their psychiatric troubles as caused by attached spirits and then systematically “blow” (expel) those spirits – a process he explicitly compares to demonic possession and exorcism in Christian practice . These insider accounts suggest that, despite Scientology’s public claims to be a scientific religion, its hidden layers engage in a form of spirit magick or shamanism.

Rituals and Dark Ceremonies: Other testimonies from former Sea Org (Scientology’s religious order) members describe occult-like ceremonies orchestrated under Hubbard’s leadership. For example, in the mid-1970s aboard the church’s ship Apollo, Hubbard reportedly conducted what was called a “Kali ceremony,” named after the Hindu goddess of destruction . According to one account, this ritual involved senior Scientologists being led, with great seriousness, into a dimly lit cargo hold and instructed to smash effigies (models of their orgs), symbolizing the destruction of impediments – an uncanny echo of magical rites to invoke destruction of obstacles . Another ex-member swore in an affidavit that Hubbard had sent him on a mission to disrupt a supposed “black magicians’ sabbat” in Los Angeles – indicating Hubbard’s continued fixation on occult conflicts even in the 1970s . (In that story, the ex-member did not carry out the armed intervention, but he claimed the gathering took place exactly where Hubbard predicted .) While such anecdotes are difficult to independently verify, they paint a picture of an organization that, behind closed doors, sometimes dabbled in ritualistic or supernatural engagements far from its public image.

Psychological Impact on Members: Several former members have reflected that these occult aspects had real psychological effects. Jon Atack, an ex-Scientologist who wrote a detailed history of the church, observed that indoctrinated Scientologists often don’t recognize their practices as occult while inside – they believe they are following a precise “technology.” Only after leaving do many realize that, for years, they were effectively involved in spiritualism – communicating with and exorcising spirit entities on Hubbard’s instructions . Atack warns that taking Hubbard’s cosmology literally (with thousands of spirit entities attached to oneself) can lead to a distorted sense of reality, even fragmentation of the self (multiple perceived identities) in some cases . In extreme instances, former members required help to unlearn the fear that they were infested with unseen beings. These testimonies underscore that alleged “demonic” or occult features in Scientology are not just abstract allegations – some members lived them and later cautioned others about them. That said, it’s important to note that many ex-Scientologists, especially those who left at lower levels, report no exposure to anything they would consider Satanic or demonic – their experiences were of a high-pressure self-help group. The occult elements tend to reveal themselves primarily in Hubbard’s own history and in the advanced teachings reserved for the most committed adherents.

4. L. Ron Hubbard’s Background and Occult Connections

Association with Occultists (Crowley and Parsons): L. Ron Hubbard’s personal history provides crucial context for these allegations. Hubbard was not a traditional religious figure; he had a documented fascination with the occult and flamboyant occultists. In the 1940s, Hubbard became friends with John “Jack” Parsons, a pioneering rocket engineer and an occult disciple of Aleister Crowley. Parsons was the head of Crowley’s Agapé Lodge in California, and Hubbard eagerly engaged in Parsons’ mystical experiments. Together in early 1946 they performed the Babalon Working – a series of Crowleyan sex-magick rituals aimed at manifesting a Goddess on Earth . Surviving accounts (including Parsons’ letters to Crowley) show that Hubbard acted as a scryer or magical partner in these ceremonies . Crowley, upon hearing of their ambitious attempt to incarnate the Thelemic “Scarlet Woman,” was alarmed and called Parsons and Hubbard “idiots” for attempting such a dangerous feat . This episode firmly links Hubbard to the dark arts milieu – he was literally invoking entities described in the Book of Revelation (the “Mother of Abominations”) as part of an occult ritual . Although Hubbard parted ways with Parsons later in 1946 amid a financial dispute, the incident left an indelible mark: it was publicly exposed decades later, giving substance to claims that Scientology’s founder had dabbled in witchcraft and devilish rituals .

Admiration for Aleister Crowley: Hubbard’s connection to Aleister Crowley – though indirect – is another cornerstone of the “Satanic influence” narrative. Crowley was an infamous British occultist who reveled in the titles “The Beast 666” and “the wickedest man in the world.” Hubbard not only knew of Crowley; he spoke of him with respect. In a 1952 lecture (the Philadelphia Doctorate Course), Hubbard referred to Crowley’s work as “very interesting” and even called Crowley “my very good friend” (despite never meeting him in person) . He recommended Crowley’s The Master Therion book to his students, noting its connection to the same “magic cults” that had fascinated Hubbard in his youth . This is significant because by the 1950s Crowley’s name was synonymous with ritual magic and Satanism in the public mind. Hubbard’s casual praise of Crowley’s “aesthetics” and lack of any denunciation of Crowley’s blasphemous persona suggests that Hubbard was deeply influenced by Crowley’s occult philosophy, even if he later synthesized it with other ideas. In fact, some of Hubbard’s own writings echo Crowleyan themes. For instance, Hubbard’s confidential 1946 diary (known as the Affirmations or Admissions) contains self-hypnosis commands wherein Hubbard affirms “that my magical work is powerful and effective” and that a “Guardian” spirit watches over him . He writes, “Nothing can intervene between you and your Guardian… She cannot be displaced because she is too powerful” . He even asserts an ability to perform automatic writing dictated by this Guardian spirit . These private reflections – not intended for public eyes – reveal that Hubbard embraced the idea of summoning or receiving guidance from spiritual entities, a practice common in occult mysticism and witchcraft. In essence, Hubbard was attempting to become a magus, honing psychic abilities and seeking otherworldly counsel, years before Scientology was established .

Other Occult Endeavors: Hubbard’s background is replete with additional occult flirtations. As noted, he joined the Rosicrucian order AMORC in 1940, going through initial initiations in mysticism . (AMORC later alleged that Hubbard misused Rosicrucian teachings in Scientology, even threatening legal action for breach of secrecy vows .) In 1938, Hubbard penned an unpublished manuscript Excalibur following a near-death experience, claiming it revealed profound truths – some speculate this episode and manuscript drew on theosophical or occult ideas that Hubbard had imbibed . Hubbard was also anecdotally known as a skilled hypnotist in the late 1940s , and he dabbled in techniques of trance and mind control – practices which, to critics, blur into the occult realm of manipulating consciousness. Even Hubbard’s pulp fiction hints at his fascinations: he wrote a horror novel called Fear (1940) about a man tormented by demons and hallucinations , suggesting Hubbard had more than a passing familiarity with demonic lore.

In summary, L. Ron Hubbard’s personal journey before and during Scientology’s founding intersects frequently with occult figures, practices, and philosophies. He synthesized these influences (ritual magic, Eastern reincarnation beliefs, early 20th-century psychotherapy, science fiction) into what became Dianetics and Scientology . The presence of “demonic” and “witchcraft” elements in Scientology can thus be traced back directly to Hubbard’s own background. However, Hubbard publically denied any nefarious intent – for instance, he portrayed himself as combating black magic rather than practicing it. According to some narratives, Hubbard claimed he infiltrated Parsons’ O.T.O. lodge as an undercover agent to break up black magic activities (a claim skeptics take with a grain of salt). Regardless of motive, it is undeniable that the founder of Scientology had extensive first-hand exposure to occult ritual and theory, which informed the cosmology he later taught his followers.

5. Doctrinal Elements and Comparisons

Spirits vs. Thetans – A Cosmological Comparison: Despite Scientology’s self-description as an “applied religious philosophy,” many commentators note that its actual beliefs about spirits and the spirit-world resemble occult and demonological concepts. In traditional demonology (e.g. in Christianity or folk witchcraft), there exists a realm of invisible beings – angels, demons, ghosts – that can influence or possess humans. Scientology similarly posits a universe teeming with disembodied spirits, though it uses its own terminology. The core of Scientology is the concept of the thetán, an immortal spirit (analogous to the soul). Unlike in Christianity, where each person has a unique soul created by God, Hubbard taught that each person is a thetan that has lived innumerable past lives. Moreover, by the time one reaches Scientology’s advanced teachings, it’s revealed that we are not alone in our bodies – our bodies and minds are actually inhabited by dozens, even thousands, of other souls or entities (“Body Thetans”) . This idea closely parallels the notion of spirit possession or attachment found in various occult traditions (and some indigenous shamanisms). Hubbard framed these attached spirits as unfortunate victims of an ancient extraterrestrial genocide (the Xenu incident) rather than malevolent fiends from Hell . Nonetheless, the practical effect is the same: Scientology’s **“upper level” healing consists largely of identifying and purging these parasitic spirit entities from oneself – which is functionally equivalent to an exorcism . Scholar Jeffrey Jacobsen has pointed out that certain early Gnostic sects also believed that multiple spirits inhabit a person’s body, causing impurity, and one must expel or rise above them to achieve enlightenment . In orthodox Christianity, having many spirits inside a person would be considered a case of demonic possession (with the biblical example of a possessed man named “Legion”), but Scientology normalizes it as a condition everyone suffers from until they “clear” these body thetans . The overlap with demonological concepts is clear – only the nomenclature and origin myths differ.

“Tech” vs. Magic Ritual: Scientology portrays its practices as a scientific “technology” for spiritual improvement, but critics argue that in substance many practices resemble occult rituals. The process of auditing – where a person holds an E-meter and is guided to revisit traumatic memories – can be seen as a modern, systematized form of guided trance or spirit communication. In fact, Hubbard himself likened some early Dianetics techniques to “shamanism and exorcism” in private correspondences (he noted the similarities when people began talking to imaginary beings during therapy) . At the Operating Thetan levels, the auditing becomes a solo activity where the practitioner is effectively in a meditative trance “telepathically” addressing unseen entities. This is highly analogous to magical evocation or mediumship – the individual is in a controlled altered state, attempting to communicate with spiritual entities to release them. Jon Atack succinctly described OT-level auditing as “an update of magical ritual”, calling Scientology “a mixture of occult ritual and 1950s-style psychotherapy” – with Hubbard’s elaborate terminology masking what is essentially a series of occult initiations . Indeed, the church requires members to ascend through a graded series of secret levels (OT I, OT II, …) much like occult orders have degree systems (e.g., the Golden Dawn’s grades or Masonic lodges). At each stage, new hidden knowledge is revealed (for example, the OT III revelation of the Xenu myth), paralleling how witchcraft covens or esoteric schools reveal deeper mysteries only to initiated members. This initiation structure, accompanied by special titles, certificates, and symbols for each level, mirrors the hierarchical mysteries of occult fraternities . The key difference is that Scientology presents these as scientific “discoveries” or therapeutic gains, whereas occult groups openly frame them as magical or spiritual attainments.

Exorcism and “Ethics” vs. Witchcraft and Curses: In demonology, an exorcist casts out demons that cause illness or misfortune; in Scientology, an auditor (or OT) “blows” body thetans that cause psychosomatic ills or aberrant behavior. The parallels are striking – even some Scientologists themselves have jokingly referred to OT III auditing as “exorcising space cooties.” Another parallel is the use of special phrases and commands (incantation-like auditing commands) to address spirits, not unlike the spells or prayers an exorcist or witch might use. There is also a concept in Scientology of “Ethics” handling to remove negative influences, which could be likened to banishing rituals in magic that drive away evil influences. However, one should note that Scientology does not invoke any higher deity or Christ figure in these rituals – unlike a Catholic exorcism that calls on God’s authority. The power in Scientology is said to come from the auditing “technology” and the inherent ability of the thetan, not from any god or supernatural grace. In that sense, Scientology’s practice is closer to ritual magic (where the practitioner believes they themselves wield the power) than to religious exorcism (which relies on God/clerical power). This self-empowerment ethos – encapsulated in Crowley’s maxim “Thou art God” – permeates Scientology. Critics like Atack have argued that Hubbard followed Crowley’s occult dictum “Do what thou wilt” in ruling Scientology, encouraging domination and control as virtues . The Church’s aggressive policies (like “fair game” against enemies) have even been described as “Satanic” by detractors, in the sense that they allegedly exalt deception and ruthless power – though the Church would strongly reject that label.

No Explicit Devil Worship: It is important to clarify that Scientology’s scriptures do not openly reference Satan, Lucifer, or any demon by those names (aside from Hubbard’s occasional metaphors or allusions in lectures). There is no worship of a devil or dark deity in Scientology’s doctrine – in fact, traditional religious concepts like God or Satan are largely absent from Hubbard’s writings. In Scientology cosmology, the role of an ultimate evil being is somewhat akin to the alien tyrant “Xenu” who caused the spiritual catastrophe 75 million years ago , but Xenu is not worshipped or venerated; he’s more a sci-fi villain than a devil figure. In practice, Scientology focuses on pragmatic techniques rather than prayer or invocation. This makes it very different from overt Satanist groups (like Anton LaVey’s Church of Satan) or witchcraft traditions that call upon spirits or deities. Hubbard at times even ridiculed belief in demons – one of his songs written late in life jokes that in olden days people “paid an awful sky high price” to priests to remove demons, and concludes “there are no demons, just the easily erased evil purpose” . Ironically, even as Hubbard denied the existence of demons in that song, his own secret teachings were centered on erasing exactly the sort of malevolent spiritual entities that most would call demons . This dichotomy leads observers to label Scientology as hypocritical or hidden occultism: outwardly denying “demonic belief” while covertly engaging in demon-type expulsions under different names.

Summary of Doctrinal Parallels: In summary, when comparing Scientology’s beliefs and practices with traditional demonology, witchcraft, and Satanism, we find both parallels and departures. On one hand, Scientology shares with occult traditions the concept of secret knowledge, tiered initiation, manipulation of spiritual forces, and the aim of personal godlike power. Its practice of removing body thetans is strongly reminiscent of spirit exorcism, and Hubbard’s early absorption of Crowley’s magick suggests an inheritance of ceremonial magic principles. On the other hand, Scientology lacks overt devil worship or sorcery in a way that would be immediately recognizable; it cloaks any such elements in scientific-sounding jargon and maintains a facade of secular professionalism. This has led some scholars to call Scientology a form of “technological occultism” – effectively magic and metaphysics repackaged as technology and therapy . Whether one views Scientology as “demonic” or not often depends on one’s interpretive lens: Devout Christians see any contact with spirits or denial of Christ as demonic by definition, whereas scholars might view it as a modern gnostic therapy drawing on occult ideas but not literally Satanic. What is clear is that Scientology’s founder borrowed liberally from occult and witchcraft traditions and that the religion’s esoteric practices invite comparison with exorcisms and magical rites. The “demonic” and “Satanic” labels, therefore, are the result of both Hubbard’s provocative connections (e.g., Crowley) and the substance of Scientology’s secretive spiritual techniques. As one analyst put it, Scientology is “a fascinating amalgam of science fiction, psychology, and the occult” – a new religion that, despite its novel terminology, continues the age-old human quest to master unseen spiritual forces, for better or for worse.

Sources:

• Urban, Hugh B. “The Occult Roots of Scientology? L. Ron Hubbard, Aleister Crowley, and the Origins of a Controversial New Religion.” Nova Religio 15(3), 2012 .

• Wikipedia: “Scientology and the Occult” (multiple cited sections on Hubbard’s occult involvement and scholarly views) .

• Atack, Jon. A Piece of Blue Sky – excerpt on Hubbard’s magical practices (via Bible.ca archive) .

• Former Scientologists’ testimonies (Ronald DeWolf interview, Dennis Erlich ARS discussions) on Scientology’s hidden practices .

• Hubbard, L. Ron – Philadelphia Doctorate Course Lectures (1952), lecture #18 (admits friendship with Crowley) ; Clearing Congress Lectures (1958) on the soul as “demon circuit” .

• Wright, Lawrence. Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief (for general background and ex-member accounts) .

• Introvigne, Massimo. “The Gnostic L. Ron Hubbard: Was He Influenced by Aleister Crowley?” Journal of CESNUR 3(3), 2019 (context on Crowley, O.T.O., and Hubbard) .